Iran fires missiles at Israel and Gulf states after US-Israeli strike kills Khamenei

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran fired missiles at targets in Israel and Gulf Arab states Sunday after vowing massive retaliation for the killing of Supreme LeaderAyatollah Ali Khameneiby the United States and Israel, prompting U.S. PresidentDonald Trumpto threaten Tehran against further escalation.

Associated Press Government supporters chant slogans as they gather in mourning after state TV officially announced the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi) Government supporters mourn in a gathering after state TV officially announced the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi) Israel's air defense missile fires to intercept missiles from Iran over Israel, Sunday, March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit) A government supporter holds a picture of the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during a gathering after state TV officially announced the death of Khamenei, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

Iran US Israel

Iran acknowledged Khamenei's death in the joint Israeli-American airstrike Saturday at his Tehran office hours, which has thrown the future ofthe Islamic Republicinto question and raised the risk of regional instability.

The 86-year-old's death at his office "showed that he consistently stood among the people and at the forefront of his responsibilities, confronting what officials call global arrogance," Iranian state TV said.

Trump said the killing of Khamenei gave Iranians their "greatest chance" to "take back" their country.

"Khamenei, one of the most evil people in History, is dead," Trump wrote in a social media post.

Iran's Cabinet vowed that this "great crime will never go unanswered" and the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard threatened to launch its "most intense offensive operation" ever, targeting Israeli and American bases.

"You have crossed our red line and must pay the price," Iran's parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf said in a televised address Sunday. "We will deliver such devastating blows that you yourselves will be driven to beg."

"Iran just stated that they are going to hit very hard today, harder than they have ever hit before," Trump fired back in a social media post. "THEY BETTER NOT DO THAT, HOWEVER, BECAUSE IF THEY DO, WE WILL HIT THEM WITH A FORCE THAT HAS NEVER BEEN SEEN BEFORE!"

Iran retaliates

After the initial strikes, Iran immediately launched missiles and dronestoward Israeland U.S. military installations in Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar. The Israeli military said Iran fired dozens of missiles at Israel, with many intercepted. The Magen David Adom rescue service said Saturday night that a woman in the Tel Aviv area died after being wounded in an Iranian missile attack.

Flights across the Middle East weredisrupted, and air defense fire thudded over Dubai, the United Arab Emirates' commercial capital, with explosions continuing into Sunday morning. Shrapnel from an Iranian missile attack on the UAE capital killed one person, state media said, and debris from aerial interceptions caused fires at the city's main port and on the facade of the iconic Burj Al Arab hotel.

The attack on Iran opened a stunning new chapter inU.S. intervention, and carried the potential for retaliatory violence and a wider war, representing a startling flex of military might for an American president who swept into office on an "America First" platform andvowed to keep out of "forever wars."

The killing of Khamenei inthe second Trump administration assaulton Iran in eight months appeared certain to create a leadership vacuum, given the absence of a known successor and becausethe supreme leaderhad final say on all major policies during his decades in power. He led Iran's clerical establishment and the Revolutionary Guard, the two main centers of power in the governing theocracy.

"This is the single greatest chance for the Iranian people to take back their Country," Trump said.

Iran quickly formed a council to govern the country until a new supreme leader is chosen.

State media also reported the deaths of the head of Iran's Revolutionary Guard and a top security adviser to Khamenei in airstrikes. Maj. Gen. Mohammad Pakpour took over as the Guard's top commander after Israel killed its past commander in the 12-day war last June. The adviser, Ali Shamkhani, had long been a figurehead within Iran's security establishment, IRNA said.

As reports trickled out about Khamenei's death, eyewitnesses in Tehran told The Associated Press that some residents were rejoicing, cheering from rooftops, blowing whistles and letting out ululations.

Mourners raised a black mourning flag over the Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad, Iran's second-largest city and a major pilgrimage site for Shiite Muslims. The Iranian government declared 40 days of public mourning and a seven-day nationwide public holiday to commemorate Khamenei's death.

Citing unidentified sources, the semiofficial Fars news agency, believed to be close to the Revolutionary Guard, reported that several relatives of Khamenei were also killed, including a daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law and grandchild.

Strikes were planned for months

The joint U.S.-Israel operation, which officials say was planned for months, took place Saturday during the Muslim holy fastingmonth of Ramadanand at the start of the Iranian workweek. It followed stilted negotiations and warnings from Trump, who last year trumpeted his administration's success in incapacitating the country's nuclear program but nonetheless cast the latest round as necessary to head off its potential resurgence.

Advertisement

About 12 hours after the attacks began, the U.S. military reported no U.S. casualties and minimal damage at U.S. bases despite "hundreds of Iranian missile and drone attacks." It said targets in Iran included Revolutionary Guard command facilities, air defense systems, missile and drone launch sites, and military airfields.

Israel, for its part, said it had killed the commander of the Revolutionary Guard Corps and the country's defense minister, as well as the secretary of the Iranian Security Council, a close adviser to Khamenei.

An Iranian diplomattold the United Nations Security Councilthat hundreds of civilians were killed and wounded in the strikes. Iran retaliated by firing missiles and drones toward Israel and at U.S. military bases in the region, and exchanges of fire continued into the night.

Some ofthe first strikeson Iran appeared to hit near the offices of Khamenei, the second leader of the Islamic Republic who succeeded Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Israeli officials confirmed the death, followed by Trump.

Democrats decried that Trump had takenaction without congressional authorization. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said the administration had briefed several Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress in advance.

Tensions soared as US built up military forces

Tensions have soared in recent weeks as the Trump administration built up thelargest force of American warshipsand aircraft in the Middle East in decades. The president insisted he wanted a deal to constrain Iran's nuclear program while the country struggled withgrowing dissentfollowingnationwide protests.

Though Trump had pronounced the Iranian nuclear program obliterated in strikes last year, the country was rebuilding infrastructure that it had lost, according to a senior U.S. official who spoke to reporters on condition of anonymity to discuss Trump's decision-making process. The official said intelligence showed that Iran had developed the capability to produce its own high-quality centrifuges, an important step in developing the highly enriched uranium needed for weapons.

Iran had said it hoped to avert a war, but it maintained its right to enrich uranium.

Iran has said it has not enriched since June, but it has blocked international inspectors from visiting the sites the U.S. bombed. Satellite photos analyzed by AP haveshown new activity at two of those sites, suggesting Iran is trying to assess and potentially recover material.

Attack was coordinated between Israel and US

Israel said the operation had been planned for months with the United States. Air Force pilots struck "hundreds of targets across Iran," Israeli military chief of staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir said in a statement.

Targets in the Israeli campaign included Iran's military, symbols of government and intelligence targets, according to an official briefed on the operation, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss nonpublic information on the attack.

Trump acknowledged Saturday that there could be American casualties, saying "that often happens in war." He said he was aiming to "annihilate" the Iranian navy and destroy regional proxies supported by Tehran. He called on the paramilitaryIranian Revolutionary Guardto lay down arms, saying members would be given immunity or face "certain death" if they did not.

In southern Iran, at least 115 people were reported killed when a girls' school was struck, and dozens more were wounded, the local governor told Iranian state TV. U.S. Central Command spokesperson Capt. Tim Hawkins said he was "aware of reports" that a girls' school was struck and that officials were looking into them.

Iran's state news agency IRNA said at least 15 people were killed in the southwest, quoting the governor of the Lamerd region, Ali Alizadeh, as saying a sports hall, two residential areas and a hall near a school were hit.

Effects could extend to markets and other countries

The strikes could rattle global markets, particularly if Iran makes the Strait of Hormuz unsafe for commercial traffic. A third of worldwideoil exportstransported by sea passed through the strait in 2025.

Saudi Arabia said Iran targeted its capital and eastern region in an attack that was repelled. Bahrain said a missile attack targeted the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet headquarters in the island kingdom, and three buildings were damaged in the capital, Manama, and Muharraq city by drone strikes and debris from an intercepted missile.

Kuwait's civil aviation authority said a drone targeted the main international airport, injuring several employees. Kuwait's state-run news agency said three troops were injured by shrapnel from strikes that hit Ali Al-Salem air base. Explosions could also be heard in Qatar. Jordan said it "dealt with" 49 drones and ballistic missiles.

Lidman reported from Tel Aviv. Boak reported from West Palm Beach, Florida. Tucker reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Joe Federman in Jerusalem, Aamer Madhani and Konstantin Toropin in Washington, Sam Mednick in Tel Aviv, Farnoush Amiri in New York, David Rising in Bangkok and AP journalists around the world contributed to this report.

Iran fires missiles at Israel and Gulf states after US-Israeli strike kills Khamenei

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran fired missiles at targets in Israel and Gulf Arab states Sunday after vowing mass...
Trump warns Iran of unprecedented force if it retaliates

March 1 (Reuters) - The United States will hit ‌Iran "with a force ‌that has never been seen ​before," U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday, should the Middle ‌East ⁠nation retaliate for U.S. strikes.

Reuters

"Iran just stated ⁠that they are going to hit ​very hard ​today, ​harder than they ‌have ever been hit before," Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

Advertisement

He added, "THEY BETTER ‌NOT DO ​THAT, HOWEVER, ​BECAUSE ​IF THEY DO, ‌WE WILL HIT THEM ​WITH ​A FORCE THAT HAS NEVER BEEN SEEN ​BEFORE!"

(Reporting ‌by Rishabh Jaiswal ​in Bengaluru; Editing by ​Clarence Fernandez)

Trump warns Iran of unprecedented force if it retaliates

March 1 (Reuters) - The United States will hit ‌Iran "with a force ‌that has never been seen ​before," U.S. Pre...
Live Updates: U.S.-Israel launch another round of strikes on Iran

Sneak peek: The Woman Who Died Twice

CBS News

Advertisement

Bill Clinton's opening statement for Epstein files deposition

Bill Clinton facing House Oversight Committee on Epstein files

Live Updates: U.S.-Israel launch another round of strikes on Iran

Sneak peek: The Woman Who Died Twice Advertisement Bill Clinton's opening statement for Epstei...
How the World Is Reacting to the Attack on Iran

A young Iranian protester shouts anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli slogans during an anti-war protest against the U.S. and Israeli military attacks, in Tehran, on Feb. 28, 2026. Credit - Morteza Nikoubazl—NurPhoto via Getty Images

Time

World leaders reacted with a mix of support, condemnation and urgent calls for restraint after the United States and Israel launched a sweeping military campaign against Iran on Saturday thatkilledSupreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

President Donald Trump announced Khamenei's death in a post on Truth Social, calling it "the single greatest chance for the Iranian people to take back their country."

The U.S. and Israel announced their strikes on the Middle Eastern nation in the early hours of Saturday morning after weeks of Trump threatening Iran over their nuclear deal program. The strikes hit the capital Tehran, as well as Qom, Karaj, Kermanshah, Tabriz and Isfahan, where there is a major nuclear facility.

Read More:Does Trump Have the Legal Authority to Strike Iran? An Expert Explains

In the hours after the initial U.S. and Israeli strikes, Russia and China released statements in support of Iran, while Canada, Australia and Ukraine were among those who expressed support for the U.S. and Israel. Several world leaders urged restraint and de-escalation on both sides moving forward.

Here is a round up of what world leaders have said about the operation that has begun war in the Middle East.

United Kingdom

Prime Minister Keir Starmer chaired a meeting of the government's emergency Cobra committee as the country weighs its response to the attacks and Tehran's retaliation across the Gulf.

It did not participate in the military action, but the country had deployed RAF Typhoons to Qatar to protect the al-Udeid airbase and allied bases across the region.

The UK government on Saturday said in a statement it "does not want to see further escalation into a wider regional conflict." Still, a government spokesperson emphasized that "Iran must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and that is why we have continually supported efforts to reach a negotiated solution."

Starmer released a joint statement with French President Emmanuel Macron and  German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, telling Iran to stop their retaliatory attacks on countries in the Middle East.

"We condemn Iranian attacks on countries in the region in the strongest terms," the joint statement reads. "We call for a resumption of negotiations and urge the Iranian leadership to seek a negotiated solution. Ultimately, the Iranian people must be allowed to determine their future."

Russia

Russia condemned the U.S. and Israel's attack, calling it  "a pre-planned and unprovoked act of armed aggression against a sovereign and independent U.N. member state," in a statement from Russia's Foreign Affairs Ministryposted to Telegram.

It accused the U.S. and Israel of  "plunging the Middle East into an abyss of uncontrolled escalation" and said the attacks could cause a "humanitarian, economic and possibly radiological catastrophe" in the Middle East.

China

China's Foreign Ministry spokespersonsaid on Xthat "Iran's sovereignty, security and territorial integrity should be respected."

"China calls for an immediate stop of the military actions, no further escalation of the tense situation, resumption of dialogue and negotiation, and efforts to uphold peace and stability in the Middle East," the statement continued.

France

In addition to the joint statement with the leaders of the United Kingdom and Germany, French President Emmanuel Macronsaid on X, in a post originally in French, that the escalation "is dangerous for all."

"It must stop," he added. "The Iranian regime must understand that it now has no other option but to engage in good faith in negotiations to end its nuclear and ballistic programs, as well as its regional destabilization activities. This is absolutely necessary for the security of all in the Middle East."

He called for an "urgent" meeting of the United Nations Security Council.

European Union

Ursula von der Leyen, the European Union's chief executive, saidin a statement on social mediathat the EU has "consistently promoted diplomatic efforts aimed at addressing the nuclear and ballistic programmes through a negotiated solution.""We call on all parties to exercise maximum restraint, to protect civilians, and to fully respect international law," she said.

Canada

Prime Minister Mark Carney saidin a statement on Xthat Canada supports the U.S. "acting to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and to prevent its regime from further threatening international peace and security."

"Canada's position remains clear: The Islamic Republic of Iran is the principal source of instability and terror throughout the Middle East, has one of the world's worst human rights records and must never be allowed to obtain or develop nuclear weapons."

Australia

Australia's Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, said in a statement on X that the country backs the U.S. in their military operation.

"We support the United States acting to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and to prevent Iran continuing to threaten international peace and security," he said.

The country also updated their travel recommendations to "Do Not Travel" for Lebanon and Israel.

Pakistan

Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs released astatementSaturday condemning what it calls "unwarranted attacks against the Islamic Republic of Iran," as well as retaliatory attacks by "Iran against the brotherly countries of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar and the UAE."

Advertisement

The Ministry confirmed that a Pakistani national was killed in the UAE during the attacks.

"We urge all sides to refrain from any further actions that may undermine the security and territorial integrity of other regional countries," the statement read.

India

India's Ministry of Foreign affairssaid in a statementthat the country is "deeply concerned at the recent developments in Iran and the Gulf region."

"We urge all sides to exercise restraint, avoid escalation, and prioritise the safety of civilians," it continues. "Dialogue and diplomacy should be pursued to de-escalate tensions and address underlying issues. Sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states must be respected."

Spain

Spain Prime Minister Pedro Sánchezcalled on Xfor " immediate de-escalation and full respect for international law," decrying the potential for another "prolonged" war in the Middle East.

"We reject the unilateral military action by the United States and Israel, which represents an escalation and contributes to a more uncertain and hostile international order," he said. "We likewise reject the actions of the Iranian regime and the Revolutionary Guard."

Saudi Arabia

The Saudi Foreign Affairs Ministry condemned Iran's retaliatory strikes across the region in a statement.

"The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia condemns and denounces in strongest terms the blatant Iranian aggression and the flagrant violation of the sovereignty of the U.A.E., Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, and Jordan,"  the statement reads.

United Arab Emirates

After the UAE was hit by retaliatory strikes from Iran, its Ministry of Foreign Affairscondemnedits neighbor in a statement, calling the strikes a  "flagrant violation of national sovereignty and a clear breach of international law and the Charter of the United Nations."

"The UAE underscored that it retains its full and legitimate right to respond to these attacks in a manner that safeguards its sovereignty, national security, and territorial integrity, and ensures the safety of its citizens and residents, in accordance with international law," the statement continued.

Oman

Oman's Foreign Minister Badr Al Busaidisaid on XSaturday after the attacks that he was "dismayed."

"Active and serious negotiations have yet again been undermined," said Al Busaidi, who has been a key mediator in recent U.S.-Iran nuclear talks. "Neither the interests of the United States nor the cause of global peace are well served by this. And I pray for the innocents who will suffer."

United Nations

Volker Türk, the UN's Human Rights Commissioner, criticized both the strikes against Iran, and Iran's retaliatory strikes."As always, in any armed conflict, it is civilians who end up paying the ultimate price," he said in a statement on Saturday. "I call for restraint and implore all parties to see reason, to de-escalate, and for a return to the 'negotiating table' where they had been actively seeking a solution only hours earlier."

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres also condemned military action on all sides of the conflict.

"I call for an immediate cessation of hostilities & de-escalation. Failing to do so risks a wider regional conflict with grave consequences for civilians & regional stability," Guterressaid on X

He also pointed out in the post that the UN's Charter prohibits "the threat of the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations."

Ukraine

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky condemned Iran for being "Putin's accomplice" in a poston X reactingto the escalation.

"It is important that the United States is acting decisively. Whenever there is American resolve, global criminals weaken. This understanding must also come to the Russians."

Albania

Albania Prime Minister Edi Ramasaid on Xthat Albania stands "firm with Israel and with the peace-seeking brotherly Arab countries" and that it supports the United States' military contribution.

"We fully endorse every decisive effort to prevent once and for all the murderers in Tehran from acquiring nuclear or any other military capacity to harm Israel or any other peace-loving nation in the Middle East," Rama said. "Terrorism must be named. And once named, it must be stopped."

Hungary

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, a Trump ally in Europe, immediately expressed concerns for how the strikes would impact oil prices. The strikes, he toldreporters, "doubled the importance of the Friendship oil pipeline," which runs through Ukraine. Shipments of Russian oil have been disrupted since January, and Orbán has accused Ukraine ofimposingan "oil blockade."

Kuwait

Kuwait's Ali Al Salem Air Base, which is used by the U.S. military, was also targeted as part of Iran's military retaliation. Kuwait released a statement condemning the Iranian attacks on their soil and asserted their right to respond to the "brazen attack" via Article 51 of the UN Charter.

Qatar

In similar statements to Kuwait and UAE, Qatar condemned Iran's retaliatory attacks and reaffirmed their own right to respond, as per international law.

"The State of Qatar expresses its strong condemnation of the targeting of Qatari territory with Iranian ballistic missiles, considering it a flagrant violation of its national sovereignty, a direct infringement on its security and territorial integrity, and an unacceptable escalation that threatens the security and stability of the region," the statement,posted to X, read.

Lebanon

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salamsaid on Xthat he "will not accept anyone dragging the country into adventures that threaten its security and unity."

Contact usatletters@time.com.

How the World Is Reacting to the Attack on Iran

A young Iranian protester shouts anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli slogans during an anti-war protest against the U.S. and Israe...
Takeaways from AP's report on the ICE detention center holding children and parents

Many Americans were alarmed recently when immigration officers in Minneapolistook custody of a 5-year-old boyand sent him and his father to a Texas detention center. But he was no outlier.

Associated Press This image provided by the family in February 2026 shows a drawing made by a 13-year-old Colombian girl when she was detained at South Texas Family Residential Center in Dilley, Texas, where the Trump administration is holding immigrant families. (AP Photo) This image provided by the family in February 2026 shows a drawing made by a 13-year-old Colombian girl when she was detained at South Texas Family Residential Center in Dilley, Texas, where the Trump administration is holding immigrant families. (AP Photo) Andrea Armero, left, watches her daughter play on monkey bars in a park in Colombia, on Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2026. (AP Photo/Fernando Vergara)

US-Immigration-Detaining-Children

The government has been holdinghundreds of children and their parentsat the Dilley Immigration Processing Center, about 75 miles south of San Antonio. Some have been detained for months.

The Department of Homeland Security has strongly defended the quality of care and conditions there.

Here are key findings from an Associated Press report on how the Trump administration's aggressive immigration enforcement is shaping life inside the facility.

Detention of children has been rising

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement booked more than 3,800 children into detention during the first nine months of the new Trump administration, according to an AP analysis of data from the University of California, Berkeley's Deportation Data Project.

On an average day, more than 220 children were being held, with most of those detained longer than 24 hours sent to Dilley. More than half of Dilley detainees during the early part of the Trump administration were children, the AP analysis found.

Sincebeing reopened last spring, the number of people detained at Dilley has risen sharply and reached more than 1,300 in late January, according to researchers. Nearly two-thirds of children detained by ICE in the early months of the Trump administration were eventually deported.

ICE holds many children longer than 20-day limit

The government is holding many childrenat Dilley well beyond the 20-day limitset by a longstanding court order.

Advertisement

"We've started to use 100 days as a benchmark because so many children are exceeding 20 days," said Leecia Welch, the chief legal director at Children's Rights, who visits Dilley regularly to ensure compliance. In a visit this month, Welch said she counted more than 30 children who had been held for over 100 days.

Many settled families among those currently detained

When the Obama administration opened Dilley in 2014, nearly all the families detained there had recently crossed the border from Mexico.

But many of those now sent to the facility have lived in the U.S. several years, according to lawyers and other observers, meaning children are being uprooted from the familiarity of schools, neighborhoods and many of the people who care for them.

Parents Allege Deficient Care

Parents and children recounted stressful conditions inside Dilley, including experiences that raise questions about the quality of care being provided.

A 13-year-old girl cut herself with a plastic knife after staff withheld prescribed antidepressants and denied her request to join her mother down the hall, the mother told the AP.

Another mother said when her 1-year-old daughter developed a high fever and vomited, medical staff repeatedly offered only acetaminophen and ibuprofen before she was eventually admitted to hospitals with bronchitis, pneumonia and stomach viruses. ICE disputed her account, saying the baby "immediately received proper care."

Other families described more routine problems, like the difficulty of getting children to sleep in quarters where lights are kept on all night and of stomach aches caused by foul drinking water.

Both adults and children described the often overwhelming stress of being detained that has caused many to despair.

ICE, DHS defend Dilley

DHS did not respond to detailed questions about Dilley submitted by the AP. But both DHS and ICE sharply refuted allegations of poor care and conditions in statements issued this week."The Dilley facility is a family residential center designed specifically to house family units in a safe, structured and appropriate environment," ICE Director Todd M. Lyons said in a statement.Dilley provides medical screenings and infant care packages as well as classrooms and recreational spaces, ICE said.Once in full operation, Dilley is expected to generate about $180 million in annual revenue for CoreCivic, the for-profit prison company that operates it under contract with ICE, according to the company's recent filing with securities regulators.In response to questions from the AP, a CoreCivic spokesman said no child at Dilley "has been denied medical treatment or experienced a delayed medical assessment." The company said detainees receive comprehensive care from medical and mental health professionals.Questions about oversightThe increased detention of families comes as the Trump administration has gutted an office responsible for oversight of conditions inside Dilley and other facilities.In years past,investigators found problems at Dilley, including consistently inadequate staffing and disregard for the trauma caused by the detention.A special committee recommended that family detention be discontinued except in rare cases, and the Biden administration began phasing it out in 2021. Dilley was closed in 2024. But in reopening it, the Trump administration has completely reversed course.

DHS did not respond to detailed questions about Dilley submitted by the AP. But both DHS and ICE sharply refuted allegations of poor care and conditions in statements issued this week.

"The Dilley facility is a family residential center designed specifically to house family units in a safe, structured and appropriate environment," ICE Director Todd M. Lyons said in a statement.

Dilley provides medical screenings and infant care packages as well as classrooms and recreational spaces, ICE said.

Once in full operation, Dilley is expected to generate about $180 million in annual revenue for CoreCivic, the for-profit prison company that operates it under contract with ICE, according to the company's recent filing with securities regulators.

In response to questions from the AP, a CoreCivic spokesman said no child at Dilley "has been denied medical treatment or experienced a delayed medical assessment." The company said detainees receive comprehensive care from medical and mental health professionals.

Questions about oversight

The increased detention of families comes as the Trump administration has gutted an office responsible for oversight of conditions inside Dilley and other facilities.

In years past,investigators found problems at Dilley, including consistently inadequate staffing and disregard for the trauma caused by the detention.

A special committee recommended that family detention be discontinued except in rare cases, and the Biden administration began phasing it out in 2021. Dilley was closed in 2024. But in reopening it, the Trump administration has completely reversed course.

Takeaways from AP's report on the ICE detention center holding children and parents

Many Americans were alarmed recently when immigration officers in Minneapolistook custody of a 5-year-old boyand sent him...
Bad Bunny, Springsteen and the wait for a defining protest song

In late January,Bruce Springsteenreleased "Streets of Minneapolis," memorializing Minnesota residents shot by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials, weaving "ICE Out Now" chants into a chorus of Trump-era resistance.

USA TODAY American singer Nina Simone (1933 - 2003) at a reception in her honour at the Hanover Grand in London, Dec. 5, 1968. A young Joan Baez, left, and Bob Dylan at a civil rights rally in Washington, D.C., in 1963. Beyoncé performs during the Pepsi Super Bowl 50 Halftime Show at Levi's Stadium on Feb. 7, 2016, in Santa Clara, California. Bad Bunny performs onstage during the Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show at Levi's Stadium on Feb. 8, 2026, in Santa Clara, California. Students perform the Bob Dylan song

Bad Bunny, Springsteen and the wait for a defining protest song

A few weeks later,U2unveiled "American Obituary," one of five songs on surprise album "Days of Ash" the band recorded to "confront these maddening times."

In February,Bad Bunnyused his Super Bowl headlining movement to highlight Puerto Rico'sgentrification and economic strugglesin front of128.2 million viewers. He ended his performance holding a football inscribed with the message "Together, We Are America".

Many of music's biggest stars are politically vocal online and in interviews. Yet the majority of new music doesn't feel tied to a defining protest moment. The songs arrive, circulate and fade out quickly. They don't seem to have the same unifying power of '60s era songs like "People Get Ready," "Give Peace a Chance" and "The Times They Are A-Changin'" that spoke to the Civil Rights Movement, anti-Vietnam War protests and mid-century counterculture.

Today, the music is out there, protest is alive, and yet it feels like something is missing.

Why, in an era when artists seem more outspoken than ever, does it feel like we're still waiting for a defining political soundtrack?

Protest music is 'romanticized,' but it's not always overt

Songs as overt asNina Simone's "Mississippi Goddam"are transcendent emblems of the 1960s. "Mississippi" was explosive and controversial to the point where Simone faced intense blowback and eventually took a break from music altogether. But not every protest song was a hit, with esteem for some coming years later.

Dr. Tammy L. Kernodle, Miami University Department of Music professor, says for many Black artists navigating crossover radio, protest music often traveled through metaphor and spirit.

"Most of Black popular music up until that point had really stayed away from any type of overt protest narrative," she says of music during the Civil Rights Movement. "Notice why I say 'overt,' because we're always saying something, even when we're not saying anything."

American singer Nina Simone (1933 - 2003) at a reception in her honour at the Hanover Grand in London, Dec. 5, 1968.

Much of the music during the Civil Rights Movement didn't "stick" in the way we assume, Kernodle says. The soundtrack to resistance thrived in specific settings; they were sung in the streets and in organizing spaces.Yet for Black music in particular, the hits of the time – fromAretha Franklin "Respect"toMarvin Gaye's "What's Going On"– used indirect messaging to make a point.

"It can be argued that most of Black music before our contemporary times is some form of protest music," she says. "Black music has always had a strain of resistance in it. So whether we were expressing joy or we were actually documenting what were experiences of oppression or systems of oppression, we've always been singing."

The reason we remember the '60s era so fondly, she says, is it had a clearly identifiable soundtrack that was threaded throughout the promotion of political movements. She calls it "systematic" how the music of Nina Simone, Bob Dylan, Joan Baez – cornerstones of popular culture – became part of the consciousness of a larger moment.

A young Joan Baez, left, and Bob Dylan at a civil rights rally in Washington, D.C., in 1963.

That includes the era's other causes. Anti-war campaigns saw Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young outcry the Kent State shootings in "Ohio" and Creedence Clearwater Revival slam the military draft in "Fortunate Son." The pro-feminism movement saw Lesley Gore declare "You Don't Own Me" and Aretha Franklin reclaim "Respect." And an anti-establishment youth rebellion overtook music with help from Bob Dylan's "The Times They Are A-Changin'" and The Beatles' "Revolution."

The era felt unified in its divergent movements, moving in tandem as the music demanded a more peaceful, equitable world.

"There is a soundtrack to this movement that we can't identify with any other time. We can talk about the blues in the 1920s, but it is not associated with the type of mass mobilization and radical social change that is embodied, like what we see in the 1960s," Kernodle says. "Those young people amped that thing up. And they did it with music because they understood that music was a way of really spreading ideology. It was also a way of disarming people's ears."

Why does it feel like political music doesn't stick today?

Engaging in protest music may be harder now. Leading up to the streaming era, protest music surged in waves. The late 1980s and '90s saw N.W.A.'s "F--- tha Police" and Rage Against the Machine's "Killing in the Name" take on police brutality. In the aughts, Green Day critiqued post-9/11 American culture with "American Idiot" and Willie Nelson returned to the charts with his cover of the satirical "gay cowboy song," "Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other," cheekily affirming his longtime friend and tour manager coming out.

But musicians now have the added issue of a fragmented music culture. Unique algorithms put people on different sides of the internet and feed them songs similar to what they're already listening to. And unlimited access to music via streaming makes it harder for smaller artists to break through.

"People are still playing music. They're still doing shows, they're still saying what they wanna say. They're still finding an audience in that way. But there's just so much more of it," saysDr. Dave Powell, who teaches the course "Protest Music and Social Change in the American Experience" at at Gettysburg College. "There's also a lot of art being made by people who are just responding to things on a day-to-day basis and that could be harder to find if you don't know where to look for it."

U2 surprise drops'Days of Ash' EP to 'confront these maddening times'

Music is also much less communal, and protest anthems require participation.

Advertisement

"We're no longer a singing nation. We don't sing collectively, cooperatively, and publicly," said Kernodle. "We sang in church. We sang in school. You sang with your friends. You sang with the radio, video. And that disappeared."

It's also easier to identify protest music when there is a surge in resistance, whether that's reflecting Vietnam anti-war sentiments in Bob Dylan's "Blowin' in the Wind," Bush Era grievances in Green Day's "American Idiot" or standing against Black Lives Matter-era racial injustice in Kendrick Lamar's "Alright."

When there is less of a sustained national uprising, you often see less of a musical response. So now, with a political resurgence in the streets and on campuses in support of Palestine or against ICE, a YouTube-famed folk singer like Jesse Welles can emerge as the protest song's newfound champion. The "War Isn't Murder" singer's reactionary style of making music – which sees him release songs several times a month – may not be topping charts, but he has found a captive audience excited about what his presence means for the contemporary political anthem.

Today's protest music carries new risks

For the artists without global stardom or creative control over their music, there is also the added layer of risk. Labels favor broad marketability and commercial viability, and potentially controversial records don't usually fit the criteria. Today's political songs are rarely promoted, and in kind, don't impact the cultural zeitgeist as they did before.

"There's always some manipulation. There's always some censoring. There's always a desire to promote artists in a particular way, especially because of that shadow of crossover being so important, particularly if you're singing in what are seen as marginalized genres," said Kernodle, referring to rap, country and R&B. "I think labels don't want to promote that now because they don't think that people have a desire for that kind of music."

Established artists are able to take more risks, saysJoseph Terry, senior lecturer in communications at the University of New Hampshire.Beyoncérarely made openly political music until two decades into her career. When it did happen, marked by the Grammy-winning singer and her dancers appearing on the Super Bowl halftime stage wearing outfits similar to those made famous by the Black Panther Party, it led Rush Limbaugh and other conservative commentators to lash out and prompted the "Saturday Night Live" skit "The Day Beyoncé Turned Black."

Beyoncé performs during the Pepsi Super Bowl 50 Halftime Show at Levi's Stadium on Feb. 7, 2016, in Santa Clara, California.

"Not everyone can be Bad Bunny, and be seen as a mainstream figure, but also be so political," Terry says, pointing out that the Puerto Rican rapper and singer's music, while fun to dance to, addresses colonization, gentrification and corruption in his homeland. Non-Spanish speakers may not be fully attuned, but it's an affirming act of resistance for fans.

There is also a tendency for contemporary artists to make their political anthems less brazen – Bad Bunny rapping about not wanting Latin families to move away from their homes is a subtle referendum on economic insecurity in "DtMF," and Lady Gaga singingabout loving yourselfin "Born This Way" was an affirmation to queer communities.

"It doesn't matter whether a lot of people might not recognize that a song is political because as long as some people do, the point is coming across," Terry says. Yet, "these simple acts of protest, I think, are seen as more controversial today, which is a larger issue than music."

What Bad Bunny's halftime showmeans for Puerto Rico

Bad Bunny performs onstage during the Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show at Levi's Stadium on Feb. 8, 2026, in Santa Clara, California.

Music has never been neutral

At February'sGrammy Awards, multiple artists including Bad Bunny,Billie EilishandKehlanispoke out about ICE, garnering praise in the room but riling up some viewers on social media. Controversial comedian Ricky Gervais took toXafter the ceremony to resurface comments he made during his 2020 Golden Globes monologue, in which he told the onlooking actors: "If you do win an award tonight, don't use it as a political platform to make a political speech. You're in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world."

"Instead of what they said to LeBron, 'Shut up and dribble,' (they're) saying, 'Shut up and sing a song,' which is so absurd," says Terry. "It's a complete ignorance of so much of music of the 20th century."

Some fans want artists with opposing views to stay silent. It's a familiar refrain, likely to get louder if protest music make a mainstream resurgence.

There is also debate over whether music does anything to actually change hearts and minds. Organizing has persisted despite the lack of universal anthems. So why do we need them now? Well, art provides a mirror to what is happening and confirmation that more than one person sees something is not right. Protest music can make the difference between giving up or continuing to fight.

"Art doesn't create movements, it reflects those movements and it can be used to sustain them and support them," says Powell. "There's a famous line attributed to Pete Seeger, that 'A good song reminds us what we're fighting for.'"

Students perform the Bob Dylan song "Blowin' In the Wind" during a school walkout to protest federal immigration enforcement at the State Capitol building on Jan. 14, 2026 in St. Paul, Minnesota.

Bruce Springsteen blasts'King Trump,' slams Alex Pretti shooting in new song

In the comments of one of Jesse Welles' most recent songs, "Good vs Ice," dozens of users thanked the singer for being a breath of fresh air in a time of such political volatility. One person wrote, "You are necessary bro. You are one of the only things the rest of us have any hope for, actually getting through the haze," adding that despite feeling helpless, "You help us all feel a little less so."

While Powell has spoken to musicians who feel that songs don't change anything, he pushes back, saying that while it may be true that music merely reinforces views people already have, it still has a valuable purpose in political movements.

"If it sustains people, if it changes their views on a particular issue, if it gives them a sense of hope when they're lacking one or forces a conversation that they otherwise wouldn't have had," he adds. "Woody Guthrie certainly had an impact on people. Pete Seeger certainly had an impact on people through his music. People like Nina Simone, Josh White, I mean these are great, great artists who change people's ways of seeing the world because of music that they made, so to me that sure seems to make a difference."

Protest music, like many things in contemporary American culture, is now immediate and reactive. And like the fights they're inspired by, the music is still unfolding.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Bad Bunny, Bruce Springsteen and a search for the new political anthem

Bad Bunny, Springsteen and the wait for a defining protest song

In late January,Bruce Springsteenreleased "Streets of Minneapolis," memorializing Minnesota residents shot by I...

Not sinceJujubeeand Raven's deeply moving, tear-filledAll Stars 1lip-synchasRuPaul's Drag Racemounted such a motherquake of emotions during a Main Stage face-off.

Entertainment Weekly Juicy Love Dion and Athena Dion lip-sync on 'RuPaul's Drag Race' season 18Credit: MTV (2)

After the judges placed them in the bottom two, Friday night's installment saw international Miami-Greece drag superstarAthena Dionduke it out against her granddaugther, dancing divaJuicy Love Dion, in a lip-sync gauntlet to "Call Me When You Break Up" by Selena Gomez, Gracie Abrams, and guest judge Benny Blanco.

The moment ended with Athena taking a knee, letting her beloved drag grandchild sit on her lap as they both burst into tears while Athena mouthed the song's symbolic lyrics, "You know I'm always here so don't ever be a stranger."

Athena Dion and Juicy Love Dion lip-sync in emotional 'Drag Race' season 18 eliminationCredit: MTV

The moment left the entire cast in tears, with Athena ultimately sashaying away from the competition — but her impact lingering in the hearts of fans (and Juicy) forever.

Now, after the painful on-set moment, Athena reacts to the devastating lip-sync in herEntertainment Weeklyexit interview. She also reacts toPit StophostBianca Del Rioshading her on episodes of the recap show, her drag daughterPlane Jane's(alleged) jokes about the star quality of season 18, and why she wanted to "fall on the sword" for Juicy in the heat of herDrag Raceelimination.

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: You woremanyeyes in the Werk Room. In hindsight, who were your ops?

You have to know all eyes will be on you. I tried diverting energy back to them, and kept my eyes on the prize to ward off jealousy, negativity, or wishes of downfall.

You can justsay Briar Blush.

She didn't last long enough, so… [Laughs]

Last week,Snatch Gamedrew pointed reactions from fans, many of whom said that original characters like yours, Greta, should be banned. Where do you stand on that?

I love these professionalSnatch Gameimpersonators chiming in to tell me what I should've done. I didn't know everybody was so proficient inSnatch Game. Unless you're there, shut the f--- up. Actually? Don't. Because I love the interaction and engagement. I'm glad it stirred reaction. I went onDrag Raceto be memorable, and I achieved that. When RuPaul looks you dead in the eye and tells you he doesn't like the character and to do something Greek, you better pull out the souvlaki and tzatziki.

Your drag relative, Plane Jane, said in a recent interview that she didn't see star quality on season 18, and that she was underwhelmed by the cast. You replied, telling her she was "disowned." She said she was just joking. Do you believe she was joking?

I don't think anybody should ever take anything Plane Jane says as serious. I don't think she ever knows what she's talking about. If there's anybody who made a career off shock value, it's Plane Jane. She keeps people talking. That's a Dion family trait I have to commend her for. There are obviously stars on the show because, hello, I'm a star, and I'm on the show. And literal Starrs:VitaandMia. The funny thing about Plane is she was dragged, that quote got her in so much hot water. She said it off the cuff, but I don't think the season 18 girlies were too happy to see that.

Advertisement

Bianca Del Rio also had a lot to say onPit Stop. She came for you early. Is there history with you two? It almost seems flirtatious!

Every time she talks about me, I get really hot. It turns me on. Somebody that has this much feeling about me? Throw me down in the bedroom and call me Sally. It's sexy to me. We've worked together twice before. I'm trying to remember, did I take her mirror by accident? Did I borrow something and not give it back? I wonder what sparked this. We were getting along just fine! I've been the object of her affection all season. I watchPit Stop, but I hold my finger on the screen to fast-forward until she talks about me. She caused me to watchPit Stopmore. Otherwise, I don't think I'd watch.

Have you heard from her?

I tag her all the time. I ask if she wants to take me out. I want to know what she likes to do on the weekends. I'm looking to build on this relationship, because there's obviously something there. There's chemistry. I spark something within her. I want to explore that further. If she's willing to give it a go, babe, I'm here for you! I'm totally open!

A formal date request?

Yeah. I think she needs to put all that energy in the right place, and I have the spot right here, ready for her.

Back to the lip-sync against Juicy, were you surprised that it ended up being you two in the bottom, or did you expect that, as fans predicted?

We got the call [to doDrag Race] within minutes of each other. I got it first, so I had five minutes to relish in it, then the harsh reality of Juicy getting the call. I was excited, but I immediately felt this weight of, we're going against each other in the biggest competition in the world. We always had this looming idea of whether or not we're lip-syncing against each other, both of us aren't going to win.

Somehow, the drag gods put us into that final lip-sync. There's no one else in the cast that I would've let or preferred to send me home. If I had to choose, I know everybody would say anybody but Juicy; I'd say Juicy or no one. I wouldn't want to go home by any of those girls. I'd want Juicy to be the one to send me home.

Athena Dion eliminated from 'RuPaul's Drag Race' season 18Credit: MTV

When you sat down and let Juicy sit on your lap, was that you accepting that you were eliminated? Did you let Juicy win?

"Let" isn't the word I'd use. I didn't want to go home. I've always been a lap for her, a shoulder for her, a steppingstone for her. We're at two different parts of our career. I walked into that show as a drag superstar. Juicy came in as a green queen searching for who she is…. This was an opportunity to fall on the sword and let her climb up farther, because I felt like I could do it [for her]. This isn't me saying that Ilether win, it was a maternal instinct, soulmate reaction.

To clarify, when you say "fall on the sword," you were wrapped up in the emotion, and felt compelled and wanted to fall on the swordforJuicy?

I don't think there's ever a moment where I'd want to defeat Juicy. I don't think she wanted to, either. That's why we ended in an embrace. It's so symbolic. It's like, nobody's winning here, because we're losing the other one. Going into the competition, I had two opportunities to win. I didn't look at it as me or her. One of us wins, the other one wins. It was more like, "Go finish this — for us."

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Get your daily dose of entertainment news, celebrity updates, and what to watch with ourEW Dispatch newsletter.

Read the original article onEntertainment Weekly

“Drag Race ”star Athena Dion wanted to 'fall on the sword' for granddaughter in emotionally devastating lip-sync

Not sinceJujubeeand Raven's deeply moving, tear-filledAll Stars 1lip-synchasRuPaul's Drag Racemounted such a moth...

 

PYN ANIO © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com